Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Forums: 

From: Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com>
Subject: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 03:54:21 +0000
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Gentlemen,

 

This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination commonly used on Lancair aircraft. Please appreciate that this is from a very small data sample, and analysis is on-going, but it’s important enough to share what we now know. 

 

Lancair (N619SJ) owner Bob Rickard called last week to advise that he’d discovered a major crack in his crankshaft at the propeller flange and wanted to alert other owners flying the above engine/prop combination of his problem. 

 

Bob has been chasing a random vibration in his airframe since he bought the aircraft three years/approximately 500 hours ago. The “standard suspects” of prop balance/run-out, engine mount/isolators, engine contact with the cowling, etc. had been systematically ruled out over time. In frustration, and unwilling to just ignore it, Bob ordered a new MT 4-blade to replace the Hartzell, remaining very uncomfortable with the vibration and unable to think of any other possible fixes. Part of Bob’s discomfort was based on the fact that he’d talked extensively to Ed Smith who had similar vibration issues with the same engine/propeller combination. (Ed’s N9JE experienced an in-flight crankshaft failure/departure of the prop in 2010; Ed successfully dead-sticked the airplane onto a beach.)

 

Bob’s recent discovery of the cracked crankshaft was made when the Hartzell was removed for replacement with a new MT prop. At the time of removal/discovery, the engine had just more than 100 flight hours since major overhaul. The crankshaft had been checked for cracks at overhaul, and the actual eddy current test results were still available showing no cracks or irregularities at that time. Bob believes that the crack developed within the last 100 flight hours as a result of long-term exposure to harmonic vibration, and that this vibration could be a result of an incompatibility between his big-bore Continental and this specific Hartzell prop. He notes that although this is an “FAA approved” engine/propeller combination, he has talked to other airplane owners flying this combination who have/are experiencing similar vibration issues. 

 

We understand that Continental and the FAA have been notified of this problem, but we have no additional information at this time. LOBO expects to publish a more detailed report on this in the next monthly newsletter, but both Ed Smith and Bob Rickard felt this discovery was worth making immediate notification about. Specifically, any unusual or new engine vibration should be cause for immediate attention. Bob considers himself very lucky to have caught the crack before in-flight failure. 

 

We’ll devote a few minutes to share what we know/answer questions at our LOBO Safety Forum to be held at 1300 in Forum Pavilion 2, Monday, 29 August, at AirVenture. Bob Rickard won’t be available to discuss this at our safety forum, but you can email him at r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com. LOBO would also appreciate an email or call (rpastusek [at] htii.com 757-286-4802) if you are experiencing similar problems.

 

Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:13:24 -0400
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Bob ,   Can you please specify the model number of the blades and hub?  More than one exist which match "78 inch Hartzell"

Colyn

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com

> wrote:

Gentlemen,

 

This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination commonly used on Lancair aircraft. Please appreciate that this is from a very small data sample, and analysis is on-going, but it’s important enough to share what we now know. 

 

Lancair (N619SJ) owner Bob Rickard called last week to advise that he’d discovered a major crack in his crankshaft at the propeller flange and wanted to alert other owners flying the above engine/prop combination of his problem. 

 

Bob has been chasing a random vibration in his airframe since he bought the aircraft three years/approximately 500 hours ago. The “standard suspects” of prop balance/run-out, engine mount/isolators, engine contact with the cowling, etc. had been systematically ruled out over time. In frustration, and unwilling to just ignore it, Bob ordered a new MT 4-blade to replace the Hartzell, remaining very uncomfortable with the vibration and unable to think of any other possible fixes. Part of Bob’s discomfort was based on the fact that he’d talked extensively to Ed Smith who had similar vibration issues with the same engine/propeller combination. (Ed’s N9JE experienced an in-flight crankshaft failure/departure of the prop in 2010; Ed successfully dead-sticked the airplane onto a beach.)

 

Bob’s recent discovery of the cracked crankshaft was made when the Hartzell was removed for replacement with a new MT prop. At the time of removal/discovery, the engine had just more than 100 flight hours since major overhaul. The crankshaft had been checked for cracks at overhaul, and the actual eddy current test results were still available showing no cracks or irregularities at that time. Bob believes that the crack developed within the last 100 flight hours as a result of long-term exposure to harmonic vibration, and that this vibration could be a result of an incompatibility between his big-bore Continental and this specific Hartzell prop. He notes that although this is an “FAA approved” engine/propeller combination, he has talked to other airplane owners flying this combination who have/are experiencing similar vibration issues. 

 

We understand that Continental and the FAA have been notified of this problem, but we have no additional information at this time. LOBO expects to publish a more detailed report on this in the next monthly newsletter, but both Ed Smith and Bob Rickard felt this discovery was worth making immediate notification about. Specifically, any unusual or new engine vibration should be cause for immediate attention. Bob considers himself very lucky to have caught the crack before in-flight failure. 

 

We’ll devote a few minutes to share what we know/answer questions at our LOBO Safety Forum to be held at 1300 in Forum Pavilion 2, Monday, 29 August, at AirVenture. Bob Rickard won’t be available to discuss this at our safety forum, but you can email him at r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com. LOBO would also appreciate an email or call (rpastusek [at] htii.com 757-286-4802) if you are experiencing similar problems.

 

Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:27:24 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Prop is HC-H3YF-1RF with TSIO-550E on L-IVP


Bob


On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:



Bob ,   Can you please specify the model number of the blades and hub?  More than one exist which match "78 inch Hartzell"

Colyn

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com

> wrote:

Gentlemen,

 
This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination commonly used on Lancair aircraft. Please appreciate that this is from a very small data sample, and analysis is on-going, but it’s important enough to share what we now know. 

 
Lancair (N619SJ) owner Bob Rickard called last week to advise that he’d discovered a major crack in his crankshaft at the propeller flange and wanted to alert other owners flying the above engine/prop combination of his problem. 

 
Bob has been chasing a random vibration in his airframe since he bought the aircraft three years/approximately 500 hours ago. The “standard suspects” of prop balance/run-out, engine mount/isolators, engine contact with the cowling, etc. had been systematically ruled out over time. In frustration, and unwilling to just ignore it, Bob ordered a new MT 4-blade to replace the Hartzell, remaining very uncomfortable with the vibration and unable to think of any other possible fixes. Part of Bob’s discomfort was based on the fact that he’d talked extensively to Ed Smith who had similar vibration issues with the same engine/propeller combination. (Ed’s N9JE experienced an in-flight crankshaft failure/departure of the prop in 2010; Ed successfully dead-sticked the airplane onto a beach.)

 
Bob’s recent discovery of the cracked crankshaft was made when the Hartzell was removed for replacement with a new MT prop. At the time of removal/discovery, the engine had just more than 100 flight hours since major overhaul. The crankshaft had been checked for cracks at overhaul, and the actual eddy current test results were still available showing no cracks or irregularities at that time. Bob believes that the crack developed within the last 100 flight hours as a result of long-term exposure to harmonic vibration, and that this vibration could be a result of an incompatibility between his big-bore Continental and this specific Hartzell prop. He notes that although this is an “FAA approved” engine/propeller combination, he has talked to other airplane owners flying this combination who have/are experiencing similar vibration issues. 

 
We understand that Continental and the FAA have been notified of this problem, but we have no additional information at this time. LOBO expects to publish a more detailed report on this in the next monthly newsletter, but both Ed Smith and Bob Rickard felt this discovery was worth making immediate notification about. Specifically, any unusual or new engine vibration should be cause for immediate attention. Bob considers himself very lucky to have caught the crack before in-flight failure. 

 
We’ll devote a few minutes to share what we know/answer questions at our LOBO Safety Forum to be held at 1300 in Forum Pavilion 2, Monday, 29 August, at AirVenture. Bob Rickard won’t be available to discuss this at our safety forum, but you can email him at r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com. LOBO would also appreciate an email or call (rpastusek [at] htii.com 757-286-4802) if you are experiencing similar problems.

 
Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO




Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com





Image


RCG Logo for Email.jpg

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: F. Barry Knotts <bknotts884 [at] earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:27:25 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Thanks for the heads up.  Not quite
sure what I will do with the information.



It seems to me that when Ed Smith had his "incident" there was
some discussion on LML about similar crankshaft separations in the
original Malibu engine / prop combination that our Lancair set-up
is based upon.  I even recall seeing a photo of the front of a
Malibu with no prop.  Instead it had a gaping hole in the
crankshaft showing where all the oil leaked out.  There may be
additional information from the FAA or Continental if you add in
the Malibu fleet.



Barry Knotts

LIV-Ps, N4XE and N24XE

 

On 7/21/2013 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek wrote:

list-6382162 [at] logan.com" rel="noopener" type="cite">

Gentlemen,

 

This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination 


Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: George Wehrung <gw5 [at] me.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:43:17 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

If anyone is interested I can send them the Hartzell manual in .pdf




On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com

> wrote:



Prop is HC-H3YF-1RF with TSIO-550E on L-IVP

Bob


On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:



Bob ,   Can you please specify the model number of the blades and hub?  More than one exist which match "78 inch Hartzell"

Colyn

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com

> wrote:

Gentlemen,

 
This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination commonly used on Lancair aircraft. Please appreciate that this is from a very small data sample, and analysis is on-going, but it’s important enough to share what we now know. 

 
Lancair (N619SJ) owner Bob Rickard called last week to advise that he’d discovered a major crack in his crankshaft at the propeller flange and wanted to alert other owners flying the above engine/prop combination of his problem. 

 
Bob has been chasing a random vibration in his airframe since he bought the aircraft three years/approximately 500 hours ago. The “standard suspects” of prop balance/run-out, engine mount/isolators, engine contact with the cowling, etc. had been systematically ruled out over time. In frustration, and unwilling to just ignore it, Bob ordered a new MT 4-blade to replace the Hartzell, remaining very uncomfortable with the vibration and unable to think of any other possible fixes. Part of Bob’s discomfort was based on the fact that he’d talked extensively to Ed Smith who had similar vibration issues with the same engine/propeller combination. (Ed’s N9JE experienced an in-flight crankshaft failure/departure of the prop in 2010; Ed successfully dead-sticked the airplane onto a beach.)

 
Bob’s recent discovery of the cracked crankshaft was made when the Hartzell was removed for replacement with a new MT prop. At the time of removal/discovery, the engine had just more than 100 flight hours since major overhaul. The crankshaft had been checked for cracks at overhaul, and the actual eddy current test results were still available showing no cracks or irregularities at that time. Bob believes that the crack developed within the last 100 flight hours as a result of long-term exposure to harmonic vibration, and that this vibration could be a result of an incompatibility between his big-bore Continental and this specific Hartzell prop. He notes that although this is an “FAA approved” engine/propeller combination, he has talked to other airplane owners flying this combination who have/are experiencing similar vibration issues. 

 
We understand that Continental and the FAA have been notified of this problem, but we have no additional information at this time. LOBO expects to publish a more detailed report on this in the next monthly newsletter, but both Ed Smith and Bob Rickard felt this discovery was worth making immediate notification about. Specifically, any unusual or new engine vibration should be cause for immediate attention. Bob considers himself very lucky to have caught the crack before in-flight failure. 

 
We’ll devote a few minutes to share what we know/answer questions at our LOBO Safety Forum to be held at 1300 in Forum Pavilion 2, Monday, 29 August, at AirVenture. Bob Rickard won’t be available to discuss this at our safety forum, but you can email him at r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com. LOBO would also appreciate an email or call (rpastusek [at] htii.com 757-286-4802) if you are experiencing similar problems.

 
Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO



<RCG Logo for Email.jpg>

Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com





Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:43:18 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

I will attempt a reply here to Barry and others who have this combination:


If:

1. you have this combination of engine / prop (in any airframe, I've spoken to non-Lancair folks that have the same issue)
2. you have an engine vibration that normal methods can't solve (dynamic balance, motor mount change, etc.)
3. you have a vibration that changes with RPM or comes and goes over the course of a long flight

Then I suggest you remove the prop and do an eddy current / dye penetrant check of the prop flange.  Especially if you have been living with this issue for a while (like I did), thinking it is an annoyance.  It doesn't feel dangerous, just annoying.  But it may be something bigger.  I'm glad I didn't let it lie any longer.



Bob R



On Jul 22, 2013, at 8:27 AM, F. Barry Knotts <bknotts884 [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:



Thanks for the heads up.  Not quite
sure what I will do with the information.



It seems to me that when Ed Smith had his "incident" there was
some discussion on LML about similar crankshaft separations in the
original Malibu engine / prop combination that our Lancair set-up
is based upon.  I even recall seeing a photo of the front of a
Malibu with no prop.  Instead it had a gaping hole in the
crankshaft showing where all the oil leaked out.  There may be
additional information from the FAA or Continental if you add in
the Malibu fleet.



Barry Knotts

LIV-Ps, N4XE and N24XE

 

On 7/21/2013 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek wrote:

list-6382162 [at] logan.com" rel="noopener" type="cite">

Gentlemen,

 
This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination 


Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Janie & Ed Smith <2luv2fly [at] cox.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:28:27 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Group,

 

I have been very quiet about my accident because of all the legal stuff coming at us from all directions, but I think I should add to this conversation about the seriousness of the situation.   As Bob P. and Bob R. have stated, this is pretty serious stuff.  I had 98 hours on a Penn Yan overhaul and new propeller when my crankshaft broke in the radius behind the crankshaft flange – just like the Malibu failure – oil everywhere, cowling chewed up, hole poked in the top of the right wing, hole poked in the right side of the fuselage and the right elevator and stabilizer cut off just outside the outboard hinge for the elevator.  Like I said – pretty serious stuff.

 

Like Bob R., I chased the vibration from day one and did all of the things that you normally do for vibrations:  Dynamic balance of the prop (two times), changed engine rubber mounts, changed hoses because I thought they were too short, looked many times for things that could be touching things they shouldn’t.  We talked with Hartzell about the vibration and their recommendation was to try rotating the prop 180 degrees (no change).  Just like Bob R., we did all of these things while we were actively flying the airplane.  It was a very subtle vibration – not bad enough to stop flying.  People who flew in our plane said they didn’t notice any vibration, but I could always feel it.

 

Point of all this conversation is that if - - if you feel any vibration, it needs to be investigated.  Because the end of the crank is pressurized with oil, you should make it  a preflight check to see if there is any oil leaking anywhere behind the propeller.  I’m just thankful that Bob R. decided to do a dye penetrant check on his crank when he did the prop rotation! 

 

I personally know of another IV-P owner who has had a vibration from the very beginning and will be stressing the need to check things a little further after what Bob R. has found.  His propeller is the full-feathering Hartzell model.

 

Our trial will be in October (almost 4 years later), so maybe after that I can answer questions a little more freely.  You just can’t believe how things you say and do can be twisted so many different ways.  When doing something to your plane, just remember……..”there is not a problem until there is a problem.”

 

Tailwinds,

 

Ed Smith

 

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bob Rickard
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 1:43 PM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

 

I will attempt a reply here to Barry and others who have this combination:

 

If:

 

1. you have this combination of engine / prop (in any airframe, I've spoken to non-Lancair folks that have the same issue)

2. you have an engine vibration that normal methods can't solve (dynamic balance, motor mount change, etc.)

3. you have a vibration that changes with RPM or comes and goes over the course of a long flight

 

Then I suggest you remove the prop and do an eddy current / dye penetrant check of the prop flange.  Especially if you have been living with this issue for a while (like I did), thinking it is an annoyance.  It doesn't feel dangerous, just annoying.  But it may be something bigger.  I'm glad I didn't let it lie any longer.

 

 

Bob R



 

On Jul 22, 2013, at 8:27 AM, F. Barry Knotts <bknotts884 [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:



Thanks for the heads up.  Not quite sure what I will do with the information.

It seems to me that when Ed Smith had his "incident" there was some discussion on LML about similar crankshaft separations in the original Malibu engine / prop combination that our Lancair set-up is based upon.  I even recall seeing a photo of the front of a Malibu with no prop.  Instead it had a gaping hole in the crankshaft showing where all the oil leaked out.  There may be additional information from the FAA or Continental if you add in the Malibu fleet.

Barry Knotts
LIV-Ps, N4XE and N24XE
 
On 7/21/2013 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek wrote:

Gentlemen,

 

This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination 

 

Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO

 

 

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Jeff Pelletier <loantracy [at] sbcglobal.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:28:29 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Yes please

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:43 AM, George Wehrung <gw5 [at] me.com

> wrote:

If anyone is interested I can send them the Hartzell manual in .pdf



On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com

> wrote:



Prop is HC-H3YF-1RF with TSIO-550E on L-IVP

Bob


On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:



Bob ,   Can you please specify the model number of the blades and hub?  More than one exist which match "78 inch Hartzell"

Colyn

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com

> wrote:

Gentlemen,

 
This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination commonly used on Lancair aircraft. Please appreciate that this is from a very small data sample, and analysis is on-going, but it’s important enough to share what we now know. 

 
Lancair (N619SJ) owner Bob Rickard called last week to advise that he’d discovered a major crack in his crankshaft at the propeller flange and wanted to alert other owners flying the above engine/prop combination of his problem. 

 
Bob has been chasing a random vibration in his airframe since he bought the aircraft three years/approximately 500 hours ago. The “standard suspects” of prop balance/run-out, engine mount/isolators, engine contact with the cowling, etc. had been systematically ruled out over time. In frustration, and unwilling to just ignore it, Bob ordered a new MT 4-blade to replace the Hartzell, remaining very uncomfortable with the vibration and unable to think of any other possible fixes. Part of Bob’s discomfort was based on the fact that he’d talked extensively to Ed Smith who had similar vibration issues with the same engine/propeller combination. (Ed’s N9JE experienced an in-flight crankshaft failure/departure of the prop in 2010; Ed successfully dead-sticked the airplane onto a beach.)

 
Bob’s recent discovery of the cracked crankshaft was made when the Hartzell was removed for replacement with a new MT prop. At the time of removal/discovery, the engine had just more than 100 flight hours since major overhaul. The crankshaft had been checked for cracks at overhaul, and the actual eddy current test results were still available showing no cracks or irregularities at that time. Bob believes that the crack developed within the last 100 flight hours as a result of long-term exposure to harmonic vibration, and that this vibration could be a result of an incompatibility between his big-bore Continental and this specific Hartzell prop. He notes that although this is an “FAA approved” engine/propeller combination, he has talked to other airplane owners flying this combination who have/are experiencing similar vibration issues. 

 
We understand that Continental and the FAA have been notified of this problem, but we have no additional information at this time. LOBO expects to publish a more detailed report on this in the next monthly newsletter, but both Ed Smith and Bob Rickard felt this discovery was worth making immediate notification about. Specifically, any unusual or new engine vibration should be cause for immediate attention. Bob considers himself very lucky to have caught the crack before in-flight failure. 

 
We’ll devote a few minutes to share what we know/answer questions at our LOBO Safety Forum to be held at 1300 in Forum Pavilion 2, Monday, 29 August, at AirVenture. Bob Rickard won’t be available to discuss this at our safety forum, but you can email him at r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com. LOBO would also appreciate an email or call (rpastusek [at] htii.com 757-286-4802) if you are experiencing similar problems.

 
Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO



<RCG Logo for Email.jpg>

Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com





Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:16:51 -0400
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Bob,  there's a blade part and a hub part.

e.g. my full feathering is a 
HC-H3YF-2UF/FC7693DF which was the latest and greatest in 2004.

(It also has a TKS slinger ring and boots on it) 


On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Bob Rickard wrote:



Prop is HC-H3YF-1RF with TSIO-550E on L-IVP

Bob


On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:



Bob ,   Can you please specify the model number of the blades and hub?  More than one exist which match "78 inch Hartzell"

Colyn

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com

> wrote:

Gentlemen,

 
This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination commonly used on Lancair aircraft. Please appreciate that this is from a very small data sample, and analysis is on-going, but it’s important enough to share what we now know. 

 
Lancair (N619SJ) owner Bob Rickard called last week to advise that he’d discovered a major crack in his crankshaft at the propeller flange and wanted to alert other owners flying the above engine/prop combination of his problem. 

 
Bob has been chasing a random vibration in his airframe since he bought the aircraft three years/approximately 500 hours ago. The “standard suspects” of prop balance/run-out, engine mount/isolators, engine contact with the cowling, etc. had been systematically ruled out over time. In frustration, and unwilling to just ignore it, Bob ordered a new MT 4-blade to replace the Hartzell, remaining very uncomfortable with the vibration and unable to think of any other possible fixes. Part of Bob’s discomfort was based on the fact that he’d talked extensively to Ed Smith who had similar vibration issues with the same engine/propeller combination. (Ed’s N9JE experienced an in-flight crankshaft failure/departure of the prop in 2010; Ed successfully dead-sticked the airplane onto a beach.)

 
Bob’s recent discovery of the cracked crankshaft was made when the Hartzell was removed for replacement with a new MT prop. At the time of removal/discovery, the engine had just more than 100 flight hours since major overhaul. The crankshaft had been checked for cracks at overhaul, and the actual eddy current test results were still available showing no cracks or irregularities at that time. Bob believes that the crack developed within the last 100 flight hours as a result of long-term exposure to harmonic vibration, and that this vibration could be a result of an incompatibility between his big-bore Continental and this specific Hartzell prop. He notes that although this is an “FAA approved” engine/propeller combination, he has talked to other airplane owners flying this combination who have/are experiencing similar vibration issues. 

 
We understand that Continental and the FAA have been notified of this problem, but we have no additional information at this time. LOBO expects to publish a more detailed report on this in the next monthly newsletter, but both Ed Smith and Bob Rickard felt this discovery was worth making immediate notification about. Specifically, any unusual or new engine vibration should be cause for immediate attention. Bob considers himself very lucky to have caught the crack before in-flight failure. 

 
We’ll devote a few minutes to share what we know/answer questions at our LOBO Safety Forum to be held at 1300 in Forum Pavilion 2, Monday, 29 August, at AirVenture. Bob Rickard won’t be available to discuss this at our safety forum, but you can email him at r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com. LOBO would also appreciate an email or call (rpastusek [at] htii.com 757-286-4802) if you are experiencing similar problems.

 
Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO



<RCG Logo for Email.jpg>

Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com





Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:37:41 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

We have been chasing a vibration from the first few hours on our Legacy IO-550 with stock compression and a Hartzell 3 blade.  I don’t have easy access to the prop model but it is the standard Hartzell supplied by Lancair for the IO-550. 

Our vibration varies in magnitude with power setting and air speed.  It is most noticeable with control stick shake but also could be felt on the dust cover.   I went thru an exhaustive series of finding engine/cowl contact points, questioning gear doors, rechecking control surfaces, two prop balances and an engine rebuild (cracked case).  I thought it was almost fixed several times since it was not easily replicated.  Then it would come back, sometimes very slightly, other times worse. 

Actually, this is a relief to know what the likely problem is after 5 years and 400 hours of chasing a fix.  We just booked a Southwest round trip to OSH.  I really don’t want to be the next statistic.  Thanks Bob and Ed.

 

Steve

 

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:37:41 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
See photo for all the numbers

Bob

image.jpeg

On Jul 22, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:

Bob,  there's a blade part and a hub part.
e.g. my full feathering is a 
HC-H3YF-2UF/FC7693DF which was the latest and greatest in 2004.

(It also has a TKS slinger ring and boots on it) 


On Jul 22, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Bob Rickard wrote:



Prop is HC-H3YF-1RF with TSIO-550E on L-IVP

Bob


On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net

> wrote:



Bob ,   Can you please specify the model number of the blades and hub?  More than one exist which match "78 inch Hartzell"

Colyn

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com

> wrote:

Gentlemen,

 
This is an alert for a potentially serious problem with the Continental IO/TSIO-550 engine/Hartzell 78” Scimitar propeller combination commonly used on Lancair aircraft. Please appreciate that this is from a very small data sample, and analysis is on-going, but it’s important enough to share what we now know. 

 
Lancair (N619SJ) owner Bob Rickard called last week to advise that he’d discovered a major crack in his crankshaft at the propeller flange and wanted to alert other owners flying the above engine/prop combination of his problem. 

 
Bob has been chasing a random vibration in his airframe since he bought the aircraft three years/approximately 500 hours ago. The “standard suspects” of prop balance/run-out, engine mount/isolators, engine contact with the cowling, etc. had been systematically ruled out over time. In frustration, and unwilling to just ignore it, Bob ordered a new MT 4-blade to replace the Hartzell, remaining very uncomfortable with the vibration and unable to think of any other possible fixes. Part of Bob’s discomfort was based on the fact that he’d talked extensively to Ed Smith who had similar vibration issues with the same engine/propeller combination. (Ed’s N9JE experienced an in-flight crankshaft failure/departure of the prop in 2010; Ed successfully dead-sticked the airplane onto a beach.)

 
Bob’s recent discovery of the cracked crankshaft was made when the Hartzell was removed for replacement with a new MT prop. At the time of removal/discovery, the engine had just more than 100 flight hours since major overhaul. The crankshaft had been checked for cracks at overhaul, and the actual eddy current test results were still available showing no cracks or irregularities at that time. Bob believes that the crack developed within the last 100 flight hours as a result of long-term exposure to harmonic vibration, and that this vibration could be a result of an incompatibility between his big-bore Continental and this specific Hartzell prop. He notes that although this is an “FAA approved” engine/propeller combination, he has talked to other airplane owners flying this combination who have/are experiencing similar vibration issues. 

 
We understand that Continental and the FAA have been notified of this problem, but we have no additional information at this time. LOBO expects to publish a more detailed report on this in the next monthly newsletter, but both Ed Smith and Bob Rickard felt this discovery was worth making immediate notification about. Specifically, any unusual or new engine vibration should be cause for immediate attention. Bob considers himself very lucky to have caught the crack before in-flight failure. 

 
We’ll devote a few minutes to share what we know/answer questions at our LOBO Safety Forum to be held at 1300 in Forum Pavilion 2, Monday, 29 August, at AirVenture. Bob Rickard won’t be available to discuss this at our safety forum, but you can email him at r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com. LOBO would also appreciate an email or call (rpastusek [at] htii.com 757-286-4802) if you are experiencing similar problems.

 
Thanks,

Bob Pastusek

For LOBO



<RCG Logo for Email.jpg>

Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com






Image


image.jpeg

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:54:03 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Here's the ticket for a stock Legacy prop, it's 70 inches as shown by the serial number (73 minus 3).  Rickard's LIV prop appears to be 76 inches, from the serial number.

I too have a vibration in my Legacy IO-550 and have had dynamic balance check out perfect.  It's around 20Hz, I'd guess, and the visible amplitude at the wingtips is about 1/4 inch.  Most passengers don't notice it; I normally cruise at 2300 rpm; it seems a little smoother at higher rpm.  I have a hard time believing that all Hartzell 3-blade props on all Lancair 550s, regardless of diameter and horsepower, have the same problem; but now I wonder.  

Just before Placerville I let the USAF's chief F-16 test pilot fly my Legacy and he commented immediately on the vibration.  I figured that's because he flies jets and gliders, neither of which ever vibrate...  but my friend's 2-blade RV-6 / O-320 doesn't have this vibration either...

Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

Charley Brown
Legacy RG  280hr



On Jul 23, 2013, at 6:37 AM, Steve Colwell wrote:



We have been chasing a vibration from the first few hours on our Legacy IO-550 with stock compression and a Hartzell 3 blade.  I don’t have easy access to the prop model but it is the standard Hartzell supplied by Lancair for the IO-550. 

Our vibration varies in magnitude with power setting and air speed.  It is most noticeable with control stick shake but also could be felt on the dust cover.   I went thru an exhaustive series of finding engine/cowl contact points, questioning gear doors, rechecking control surfaces, two prop balances and an engine rebuild (cracked case).  I thought it was almost fixed several times since it was not easily replicated.  Then it would come back, sometimes very slightly, other times worse. 

Actually, this is a relief to know what the likely problem is after 5 years and 400 hours of chasing a fix.  We just booked a Southwest round trip to OSH.  I really don’t want to be the next statistic.  Thanks Bob and Ed.

 

Steve

 




Image


PastedGraphic-1.png

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:21:58 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.



Paul



On 2013-07-25, at 9:54, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net> wrote:



>

> Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

>

> Charley Brown

> Legacy RG  280hr

>

>

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:10:33 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

The key point that this thread is about is a vibration that is NOT "normal".  The key indicator is a change in the magnitude of the vibration with a change in RPM.  There are enough of you out there that have responded to me directly that state you have made all attempts at correcting the "normal" vibration issues, ruling out alternators, cowl interference, motor mounts, dynamic balancing, crank counter weights, etc.  Those things are normal and would not likely cause damage to the crank prop flange if left untreated.  The problem we are discussing is related to the prop/engine combination.  

We have confirmed reports of 550 motors being smooth with McCauley props, Aerocomposite Props and MT props, to answer Charley's question below.  However, NO ONE has come forward and said "My 550 engine/Hartzell Scimitar 78" prop combination is smooth".  I would be very interested if someone out there can say that.  To the contrary, I have received multiple responses from 4 different aircraft types that say "I have dealt with this for a long time and can't fix it".  Now what?

Bob R



On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com

> wrote:



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.

Paul

On 2013-07-25, at 9:54, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net

> wrote:



Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

Charley Brown
Legacy RG  280hr



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html




Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com






Image


RCG Logo for Email.jpg

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:18:16 -0400
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

So how do you get your alternator balanced?  non-aviation shops won't touch them and aviation shops don't want to open them



On Jul 25, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Paul Miller wrote:



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.



Paul



On 2013-07-25, at 9:54, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net> wrote:



>

> Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

>

> Charley Brown

> Legacy RG  280hr

>

>



--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:22:30 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This

has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.



First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted

and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.



At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the

Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.

Also found a cracked case.



We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by

Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file

is in Texas.



I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so

I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.



All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.



The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web

page.



Along the way the prop was balanced twice.



I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too

much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would

increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably

because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate

previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.



Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade







-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Paul

Miller

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you

describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling

interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can

be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the

prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the

wingtip also.



Paul





Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:22:30 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Bob, my reply that you refer to was a direct answer to Charlie's question and that's why I quoted him.  Yes, there are 550 engines that run smooth with a hartzell. That's a data point.   We are not running 78 inch diameter blades however.  I have a change in vibration magnitude with rpm so there's another datapoint.

Paul

On 2013-07-25, at 12:10, Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com

> wrote:


The key point that this thread is about is a vibration that is NOT "normal".  The key indicator is a change in the magnitude of the vibration with a change in RPM.  There are enough of you out there that have responded to me directly that state you have made all attempts at correcting the "normal" vibration issues, ruling out alternators, cowl interference, motor mounts, dynamic balancing, crank counter weights, etc.  Those things are normal and would not likely cause damage to the crank prop flange if left untreated.  The problem we are discussing is related to the prop/engine combination.  

We have confirmed reports of 550 motors being smooth with McCauley props, Aerocomposite Props and MT props, to answer Charley's question below.  However, NO ONE has come forward and said "My 550 engine/Hartzell Scimitar 78" prop combination is smooth".  I would be very interested if someone out there can say that.  To the contrary, I have received multiple responses from 4 different aircraft types that say "I have dealt with this for a long time and can't fix it".  Now what?

Bob R



On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com

> wrote:



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.

Paul

On 2013-07-25, at 9:54, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net

> wrote:



Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

Charley Brown
Legacy RG  280hr



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



<RCG Logo for Email.jpg>

Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com




Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Douglas Johnson <lancair1 [at] bellsouth.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:44:11 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
My 550/hartzell scimitar is and has always been smooth.
1350hrs TT

Douglas Johnson MD
Sent from my iPad

On Jul 25, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com

> wrote:


The key point that this thread is about is a vibration that is NOT "normal".  The key indicator is a change in the magnitude of the vibration with a change in RPM.  There are enough of you out there that have responded to me directly that state you have made all attempts at correcting the "normal" vibration issues, ruling out alternators, cowl interference, motor mounts, dynamic balancing, crank counter weights, etc.  Those things are normal and would not likely cause damage to the crank prop flange if left untreated.  The problem we are discussing is related to the prop/engine combination.  

We have confirmed reports of 550 motors being smooth with McCauley props, Aerocomposite Props and MT props, to answer Charley's question below.  However, NO ONE has come forward and said "My 550 engine/Hartzell Scimitar 78" prop combination is smooth".  I would be very interested if someone out there can say that.  To the contrary, I have received multiple responses from 4 different aircraft types that say "I have dealt with this for a long time and can't fix it".  Now what?

Bob R



On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com

> wrote:



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.

Paul

On 2013-07-25, at 9:54, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net

> wrote:



Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

Charley Brown
Legacy RG  280hr



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



<RCG Logo for Email.jpg>

Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com




Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:55:22 -0400
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Doug,  there was an earlier scimitar.    Just want to verify you are talking the same part number.    Colyn 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Douglas Johnson <lancair1 [at] bellsouth.net

> wrote:

My 550/hartzell scimitar is and has always been smooth.
1350hrs TT

Douglas Johnson MD
Sent from my iPad

On Jul 25, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com

> wrote:


The key point that this thread is about is a vibration that is NOT "normal".  The key indicator is a change in the magnitude of the vibration with a change in RPM.  There are enough of you out there that have responded to me directly that state you have made all attempts at correcting the "normal" vibration issues, ruling out alternators, cowl interference, motor mounts, dynamic balancing, crank counter weights, etc.  Those things are normal and would not likely cause damage to the crank prop flange if left untreated.  The problem we are discussing is related to the prop/engine combination.  

We have confirmed reports of 550 motors being smooth with McCauley props, Aerocomposite Props and MT props, to answer Charley's question below.  However, NO ONE has come forward and said "My 550 engine/Hartzell Scimitar 78" prop combination is smooth".  I would be very interested if someone out there can say that.  To the contrary, I have received multiple responses from 4 different aircraft types that say "I have dealt with this for a long time and can't fix it".  Now what?

Bob R



On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com

> wrote:



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.

Paul

On 2013-07-25, at 9:54, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net

> wrote:



Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

Charley Brown
Legacy RG  280hr



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



<RCG Logo for Email.jpg>

Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com




Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:46:42 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

I can find out from Bill Bainbridge of B&C at Airventure.  The shop he

recommended found a several built in problems with our Kelly rebuilt main

alt. when they balanced it.



Steve Colwell



-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Colyn

Case

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:18 PM

To: Lancair Mailing List

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



So how do you get your alternator balanced?  non-aviation shops won't touch

them and aviation shops don't want to open them



On Jul 25, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Paul Miller wrote:



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you

describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling

interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can

be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the

prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the

wingtip also.



Paul



On 2013-07-25, at 9:54, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net> wrote:



>

> Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550)

with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of

low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm

wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

>

> Charley Brown

> Legacy RG  280hr

>

>



--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html





--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Dennis Johnson <pinetownd [at] volcano.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:46:42 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
I have a smooth running Legacy RG IO-550 with a three blade Hartzell
scimitar prop, HC-J3YF-1RF/F7391D-3/SM7. 
 
According to Hartzell's website, this is the recommended three blade
scimitar prop for the Legacy RG with IO-550 engine.  It is a 72" diameter
prop, not the 78" prop mentioned in Bob R's posting.  I thought all the
scimitar props on Legacys were the same as mine.
 
 
I consider mine to be "smooth," but that is a terribly subjective
concept.  However, I can say for sure that I do not feel vibration in the
stick and don't see any aileron vibration or wing tip
vibration.  Another Legacy builder and pilot commented on how smooth
mine is, but maybe he was just being polite.   
 
Unless there is a way to quantify "vibration" and "smoothness," I don't see
how we can accurately communicate about this.  One person's rough could be
another person's smooth.  Maybe if someone had a video of stick shake
or aileron shake?  A glass of water sitting on the glare
shield? 
 
Dennis
Legacy 625 hours 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Craig Berland <cberland [at] systems3.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:46:42 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

So how do you get your alternator balanced?  non-aviation shops won't touch them and aviation shops don't want to open them

Call these guys.

Aircraft Systems

5187 Falcon Road

Rockford, IL 61109-2986

(815) 399-0225

Terry Norris, Sr.

 

Craig Berland

N7VG




Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:46:43 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
I am pretty sure mine is a 78" prop.  See Lancair site


All Hartzell prop models 78"

Bob

On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net

> wrote:

Here's the ticket for a stock Legacy prop, it's 70 inches as shown by the serial number (73 minus 3).  Rickard's LIV prop appears to be 76 inches, from the serial number.
<PastedGraphic-1.png>

I too have a vibration in my Legacy IO-550 and have had dynamic balance check out perfect.  It's around 20Hz, I'd guess, and the visible amplitude at the wingtips is about 1/4 inch.  Most passengers don't notice it; I normally cruise at 2300 rpm; it seems a little smoother at higher rpm.  I have a hard time believing that all Hartzell 3-blade props on all Lancair 550s, regardless of diameter and horsepower, have the same problem; but now I wonder.  

Just before Placerville I let the USAF's chief F-16 test pilot fly my Legacy and he commented immediately on the vibration.  I figured that's because he flies jets and gliders, neither of which ever vibrate...  but my friend's 2-blade RV-6 / O-320 doesn't have this vibration either...

Has anyone definitely flown a vibration-free IO-550 Lancair (or TSIO-550) with *any* propeller?  And by vibration-free, I mean it is free of low-frequency 10-20Hz stuff, not the normal noise of flying.  What I'm wondering is...  is it the 550, making such vibration with *any* propeller?

Charley Brown
Legacy RG  280hr



On Jul 23, 2013, at 6:37 AM, Steve Colwell wrote:



We have been chasing a vibration from the first few hours on our Legacy IO-550 with stock compression and a Hartzell 3 blade.  I don’t have easy access to the prop model but it is the standard Hartzell supplied by Lancair for the IO-550. 

Our vibration varies in magnitude with power setting and air speed.  It is most noticeable with control stick shake but also could be felt on the dust cover.   I went thru an exhaustive series of finding engine/cowl contact points, questioning gear doors, rechecking control surfaces, two prop balances and an engine rebuild (cracked case).  I thought it was almost fixed several times since it was not easily replicated.  Then it would come back, sometimes very slightly, other times worse. 

Actually, this is a relief to know what the likely problem is after 5 years and 400 hours of chasing a fix.  We just booked a Southwest round trip to OSH.  I really don’t want to be the next statistic.  Thanks Bob and Ed.

 

Steve

 


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:23:38 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Multiple interesting facts:

A.  Several folks chimed in with smooth-running Legacy IO-550s with stock 3-blade.  I think we have solid indications that it's not just the 550; and that it's not just the 550 plus the Hartzell scimitar.  To Clark Baker:  Yes, I'm very clear that there's no interference between cowl and prop on my airplane -- but thanks for checking.

B.  Dennis Johnson found a Hartzell page, and Bob Rickard found a Lancair page, that both characterize their propellers as different diameters than Hartzell's blade model number indicates.  According to Hartzell's application guide:
-- An F7693DF blade (Rickard) is 76 inches (F76; and no dash number).
-- An F7391D-3 (stock Legacy) is 70 inches (F73; minus 3 inches for the -3)
Not sure how much difference that makes; but it's good to start with consistent data.





On Jul 25, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Dennis Johnson wrote:



I have a smooth running Legacy RG IO-550 with a three blade Hartzell scimitar prop, HC-J3YF-1RF/F7391D-3/SM7. 
 
According to Hartzell's website, this is the recommended three blade scimitar prop for the Legacy RG with IO-550 engine.  It is a 72" diameter prop, not the 78" prop mentioned in Bob R's posting.  I thought all the scimitar props on Legacys were the same as mine.
 
 
I consider mine to be "smooth," but that is a terribly subjective concept.  However, I can say for sure that I do not feel vibration in the stick and don't see any aileron vibration or wing tip vibration.  Another Legacy builder and pilot commented on how smooth mine is, but maybe he was just being polite.   
 
Unless there is a way to quantify "vibration" and "smoothness," I don't see how we can accurately communicate about this.  One person's rough could be another person's smooth.  Maybe if someone had a video of stick shake or aileron shake?  A glass of water sitting on the glare shield? 
 
Dennis
Legacy 625 hours 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Image


Screen shot 2013-07-25 at 8.12.43 PM.png

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: F. Barry Knotts <bknotts884 [at] earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:22:33 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

For no particular reason, I was browsing through the Continental Engine Maintenance and Overhaul Manual (M-18) for the TSIO-550 family of engines.  The engine specifications are listed on pages 2-22 through 2-33.  Each of these engines has a "Minimum Cruise RPM" of 2300 RPM.   I was unaware that there was any RPM restriction (other than max. RPM) on these engines.



I never go that low.  My minimum cruise RPM is 2400.



Does anyone use a cruise RPM below 2300?



Barry Knotts

LIV-P, N4XE

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Kyrilian Dyer <kyrilian_av [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:22:33 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
If you'd like to measure the frequency and amplitude of relatively low frequency vibration I'd recommend an iPhone app called 'Vibration' ($4.99 from the App Store).  It's certainly not high end but it may help in characterizing some of the vibrations that you guys describe. The only problem I see is that it only samples up to 100 Hz, which gives you frequency data up to 44.9 Hz (~2690 rpm).  This won't give you any data at propeller frequencies.  But it may help tell if its a function of RPM at 1/rev, or if it's asynchronous with the engine (and doesn't correlate with engine speed, such as buffet or flutter).

A few screenshots (recording of an out of balance car tire at 70 mph) are shown below. Note that the app can output data to a .csv file, which can be reviewed/analyzed later.  I do this sort of thing with proper accelerometers, recorders and analyzers on helicopters in my day job, so I'd like to help if I can.  If anyone has luck with the iPhone app please send me the data files.  Perhaps we could then compare between aircraft.

 Regards,
- Kyrilian
  L2K-236

Time display:
image.png

DFT (note spike at around 16 Hz)
image.png

Setup (one of several sub screens)
image.png


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:46 PM, "Dennis Johnson" <pinetownd [at] volcano.net

> wrote:

I have a smooth running Legacy RG IO-550 with a three blade Hartzell
scimitar prop, HC-J3YF-1RF/F7391D-3/SM7. 
 
According to Hartzell's website, this is the recommended three blade
scimitar prop for the Legacy RG with IO-550 engine.  It is a 72" diameter
prop, not the 78" prop mentioned in Bob R's posting.  I thought all the
scimitar props on Legacys were the same as mine.
 
 
I consider mine to be "smooth," but that is a terribly subjective
concept.  However, I can say for sure that I do not feel vibration in the
stick and don't see any aileron vibration or wing tip
vibration.  Another Legacy builder and pilot commented on how smooth
mine is, but maybe he was just being polite.   
 
Unless there is a way to quantify "vibration" and "smoothness," I don't see
how we can accurately communicate about this.  One person's rough could be
another person's smooth.  Maybe if someone had a video of stick shake
or aileron shake?  A glass of water sitting on the glare
shield? 
 
Dennis
Legacy 625 hours 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Image


image.png


Image


image.png


Image


image.png

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:22:33 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

This is the shop that did ours.

Steve



Call these guys.

Aircraft Systems

5187 Falcon Road

Rockford, IL 61109-2986

(815) 399-0225

Terry Norris, Sr.



Craig Berland

N7VG



-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Steve

Colwell

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 5:47 PM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



I can find out from Bill Bainbridge of B&C at Airventure.  The shop he

recommended found a several built in problems with our Kelly rebuilt main

alt. when they balanced it.



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:22:33 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

I have the same Prop Model as Dennis, (HC-J3YF-1RF/F7391D-3) and photos of the Blade labels and Hub etching for the record.  Concerning the degree of vibration.  When we have experienced stick shake I would call it ALARMING!  A noticeable increase in vibration I would call Attention Getting.

 

Steve Colwell

 

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 07:42:19 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Kyrillian, thanks.  I will check out this app.  I think a good place to put the iPhone would be to clamp it directly to the copilot's floorboard.



I have never had alarming vibration like Steve Colwell cites, so maybe we are talking about two entirely different situations.



I cruise at 2300.  Continental has had some crankshaft problems with engines that were cruised at 2200, but I forget the details and I'm not even sure they were 550s.  





On Jul 26, 2013, at 5:22 AM, Kyrilian Dyer wrote:



If you'd like to measure the frequency and amplitude of relatively low frequency vibration I'd recommend an iPhone app called 'Vibration' ($4.99 from the App Store).  It's certainly not high end but it may help in characterizing some of the vibrations that you guys describe. The only problem I see is that it only samples up to 100 Hz, which gives you frequency data up to 44.9 Hz (~2690 rpm).  This won't give you any data at propeller frequencies.  But it may help tell if its a function of RPM at 1/rev, or if it's asynchronous with the engine (and doesn't correlate with engine speed, such as buffet or flutter).



A few screenshots (recording of an out of balance car tire at 70 mph) are shown below. Note that the app can output data to a .csv file, which can be reviewed/analyzed later.  I do this sort of thing with proper accelerometers, recorders and analyzers on helicopters in my day job, so I'd like to help if I can.  If anyone has luck with the iPhone app please send me the data files.  Perhaps we could then compare between aircraft.



 Regards,

- Kyrilian

  L2K-236



Time display:

<image.png>



DFT (note spike at around 16 Hz)

<image.png>



Setup (one of several sub screens)

<image.png>





Sent from my iPhone



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:47:38 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly.  



Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze

Lancair N73S





On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com> wrote:



In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This

has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.



First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted

and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.



At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the

Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.

Also found a cracked case.



We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by

Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file

is in Texas.



I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so

I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.



All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.



The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web

page.



Along the way the prop was balanced twice.



I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too

much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would

increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably

because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate

previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.



Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade







-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Paul

Miller

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you

describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling

interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can

be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the

prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the

wingtip also.



Paul





Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: John Smith <john [at] jjts.net.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:47:38 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Kryilian,

I too have this vibration phenomenon in VH-XTZ – I spent hours and hours of flying time trying to isolate it, trying different power settings, different aircraft loading, different angles of attack, you name it – I could not find a pattern. Mostly its there, but occasionally nothing. Visually, it manifests itself with a very slight port wing tip / aileron quiver; physically, you can mainly feel it ever so slightly in the rudder pedals. Having said all this, others fly in the aircraft and don't know what I'm on about.  But, I have now found that running at about 2540rpm is quite smooth and all but gets rid of the vibration. Its noticeably worse at say 2400 – 2450rpm.

So – endeavouring to quantify things, I employed the iPhone App you have mentioned.  The attached pics are from way back in 2011; these should give everyone an idea of what can be produced. Below my comments at the time wrt to attached samples.

As one of our other forum contributors mentioned, vibration is very subjective without the use of measurement devices… so can I suggest that those whip have access to iPhones go flying and capture outputs in the same manner and with same engine settings – how about with iPhone resting on centre console and engine set at 2500rpm, 19" and leaned 28degC (50degF) rich of peak…. Or as anyone else might suggest otherwise.  Then we can all collect data that should be legitimately comparable, and perhaps identify if there are any substantial differences in the vibration characteristics. Anyways, just an idea….

Comments from tests in August 2011:-

Captured three outputs with 2400rpm and about 19” MAP.  First sample with iPhone on the centre console shows a spike at ~20Hz – that is approx. equivalent to 1200rpm, which exactly half the engine engine rpm. For other two samples, iPhone on the dust cover in the middle and then a bit to one side; these show the same 20Hz spike, and also a spike around 38 - 40Hz – this would seem to be close to the engine rpm, but 38Hz is equivalent to 2280rpm, which does not make sense as there is no way the engine rpm varies by that much. So, I’m not sure what all this means. I’d love to get the iPhone onto the rudder pedals, but that’s kind of tricky! The iPhone doesn’t measure above 50Hz, so I can detect prop beat or exhaust beat.


Regards,



John



John N G Smith

Tel / fax:    +61-8-9385-8891

Mobile:      +61-409-372-975

Email:         john [at] jjts.net.au



From: Kyrilian Dyer <kyrilian_av [at] yahoo.com

>
Reply-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Date: Friday, 26 July 2013 6:22 PM
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

If you'd like to measure the frequency and amplitude of relatively low frequency vibration I'd recommend an iPhone app called 'Vibration' ($4.99 from the App Store).  It's certainly not high end but it may help in characterizing some of the vibrations that you guys describe. The only problem I see is that it only samples up to 100 Hz, which gives you frequency data up to 44.9 Hz (~2690 rpm).  This won't give you any data at propeller frequencies.  But it may help tell if its a function of RPM at 1/rev, or if it's asynchronous with the engine (and doesn't correlate with engine speed, such as buffet or flutter).

A few screenshots (recording of an out of balance car tire at 70 mph) are shown below. Note that the app can output data to a .csv file, which can be reviewed/analyzed later.  I do this sort of thing with proper accelerometers, recorders and analyzers on helicopters in my day job, so I'd like to help if I can.  If anyone has luck with the iPhone app please send me the data files.  Perhaps we could then compare between aircraft.

 Regards,
- Kyrilian
  L2K-236

Time display:
image.png

DFT (note spike at around 16 Hz)
image.png

Setup (one of several sub screens)
image.png


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:46 PM, "Dennis Johnson" <pinetownd [at] volcano.net

> wrote:

I have a smooth running Legacy RG IO-550 with a three blade Hartzell
scimitar prop, HC-J3YF-1RF/F7391D-3/SM7. 
 
According to Hartzell's website, this is the recommended three blade
scimitar prop for the Legacy RG with IO-550 engine.  It is a 72" diameter
prop, not the 78" prop mentioned in Bob R's posting.  I thought all the
scimitar props on Legacys were the same as mine.
 
 
I consider mine to be "smooth," but that is a terribly subjective
concept.  However, I can say for sure that I do not feel vibration in the
stick and don't see any aileron vibration or wing tip
vibration.  Another Legacy builder and pilot commented on how smooth
mine is, but maybe he was just being polite.   
 
Unless there is a way to quantify "vibration" and "smoothness," I don't see
how we can accurately communicate about this.  One person's rough could be
another person's smooth.  Maybe if someone had a video of stick shake
or aileron shake?  A glass of water sitting on the glare
shield? 
 
Dennis
Legacy 625 hours 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Image


image.png


Image


image.png


Image


image.png

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:47:50 +0000
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Barry,



I ran my engine as slow as 2200 RPM during 2008-2009; then increased to a min of 2300 when the bulletin came out on this. I now cruise at 2300 RPM most of the time, increasing to 2400 when I want to go a bit faster/run a higher power setting.



(I normally run LOP at 2300 RPM/29" MP/14.0 GPH fuel flow, and take what IAS that yields. That's generally 80 LOP on the richest cylinder and 100 LOP or less on the leanest...this changes with temp and engine RPM)



Bob



PS: Now at 1050 total engine hours, but had to replace a cracked crankcase (around #1 cylinder studs) at 520 TT, so really not a 1,000 hour engine. I have run it LOP, except for TO & climb, since it was broken in at about 20 hours TT.







For no particular reason, I was browsing through the Continental Engine Maintenance and Overhaul Manual (M-18) for the TSIO-550 family of engines.  The engine specifications are listed on pages 2-22 through

2-33.  Each of these engines has a "Minimum Cruise RPM" of 2300 RPM.   I

was unaware that there was any RPM restriction (other than max. RPM) on these engines.



I never go that low.  My minimum cruise RPM is 2400.



Does anyone use a cruise RPM below 2300?



Barry Knotts

LIV-P, N4XE



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:22:40 +0000
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

The other related variable on prop blades is "runout" or "blade tracking." Although it's as severe as with different pitch angles, ;but significant variation between blade tracking can also be a cause of vibration. Always worth checking as part of these checks.



Bob



-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Craig Schulze

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:48 PM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly.  



Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze

Lancair N73S





On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com> wrote:



In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.



First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.



At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.

Also found a cracked case.



We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file is in Texas.



I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.



All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.



The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web page.



Along the way the prop was balanced twice.



I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too

much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.



Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade







-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Paul Miller

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.



Paul







--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html





Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Art Jensen <flycassutts [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:45:47 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Craig,
I recently had my 70 Amp Kelly Aerospace Alternator balanced by Aircraft Systems, Inc. According to the paperwork it tested at 45.9 grain inches before and 2.0 grain inches after balance. Their phone number is 815-399-0225 should you have questions.

Art Jensen
Legacy

Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad



From:

Craig Berland <cberland [at] systems3.net>;


To:

<lml [at] lancaironline.net>;


Subject:

[LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration


Sent:

Fri, Jul 26, 2013 12:46:42 AM


So how do you get your alternator balanced?  non-aviation shops won't touch them and aviation shops don't want to open them

Call these guys.

Aircraft Systems

5187 Falcon Road

Rockford, IL 61109-2986

(815) 399-0225

Terry Norris, Sr.

 

Craig Berland

N7VG




Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Danny <danny [at] n107sd.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:45:47 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

On what data do you make this assessment?



Danny

LNC2-360 Mk-II

Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool.



-----Original Message-----

From: Craig Schulze [craig [at] skybolt.net (mailto:)

]

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:48 PM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing

the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are

feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything

to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting

the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly.  



Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze

Lancair N73S





On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com> wrote:



In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This

has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.



First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted

and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.



At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the

Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.

Also found a cracked case.



We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by

Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file

is in Texas.



I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so

I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.



All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.



The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web

page.



Along the way the prop was balanced twice.



I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too

much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would

increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably

because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate

previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.



Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade







-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Paul

Miller

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you

describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling

interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can

be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the

prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the

wingtip also.



Paul







--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek [at] htii.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:12:35 +0000
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

My writing got "edited" somehow; it should have read:



The other related variable on prop blades is "runout" or "blade tracking." Although it's NOT as severe as that caused by different blade pitch angles, significant variation between blade tracking can also be a cause of vibration. Always worth checking as part of these checks.



This is relatively easy to do by removing the plugs so you can rotate the engine easily without moving the airplane around in the process. Place a fixed work stand/stool in front of the prop and clamp a ruler or straightedge to it so it extends back toward the prop to just touch the leading edge, about 4" or so from the tip. Adjust the position of the straightedge as you rotate the prop blades past it until it just touches the closest one, then measure the "gap" between each other blade and the straightedge. Ideally there is no gap, but it's almost impossible to produce/maintain this standard. Different prop manufacturers specify the allowable gap; anything less than 0.20" will likely produce little/no vibration; the amount increases with the increase of tracking run-out. To make it more complex, it's almost impossible to measure this at anything but fine pitch--or the pitch stop setting for our variable-pitch props--in the field. Truly accurate runout measurements require the tools of a proper overhaul shop.



Bob

-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Robert R Pastusek

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 1:23 PM

To: Lancair Mailing List

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



The other related variable on prop blades is "runout" or "blade tracking." Although it's as severe as with different pitch angles, ;but significant variation between blade tracking can also be a cause of vibration. Always worth checking as part of these checks.



Bob



-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Craig Schulze

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:48 PM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly.  



Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze

Lancair N73S





On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com> wrote:



In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.



First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.



At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.

Also found a cracked case.



We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file is in Texas.



I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.



All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.



The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web page.



Along the way the prop was balanced twice.



I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too

much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.



Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade







-----Original Message-----

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Paul Miller

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration



Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the prop.



The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the wingtip also.



Paul







--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html







--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html





Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:30:38 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

It's really only a guess.  But if you think about it the only thing changing with a throttle change is pitch.  



Blue Skies,

Craig



On Jul 26, 2013, at 10:45 AM, "Danny" <danny [at] n107sd.com> wrote:



> On what data do you make this assessment?

>

> Danny

> LNC2-360 Mk-II

> Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Craig Schulze [craig [at] skybolt.net (mailto:)

]

> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:48 PM

> To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

> Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

>

> It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing

> the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are

> feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything

> to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting

> the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly.  

>

> Blue Skies,

> Craig Schulze

> Lancair N73S

>

>

> On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com> wrote:

>

> In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This

> has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

>

> First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted

> and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

>

> At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the

> Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.

> Also found a cracked case.

>

> We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by

> Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file

> is in Texas.

>

> I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so

> I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

>

> All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

>

> The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web

> page.

>

> Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

>

> I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too

> much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would

> increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably

> because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate

> previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

>

> Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of Paul

> Miller

> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM

> To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

> Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

>

> Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you

> describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling

> interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can

> be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the

> prop.

>

> The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the

> wingtip also.

>

> Paul

>

>

>

> --

> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

>

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Wolfgang <Wolfgang [at] MiCom.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:30:38 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
It sounds like accelerometers mounted in suspect
locations with the engine running at the RPM indicated by the spike shown by the
Apple app. would lead you to the culprit.
 
Wolfgang
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
john [at] jjts.net.au (John Smith)

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:47
PM
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential
Problem-Engine Vibration

Kryilian,

I too have this vibration phenomenon in VH-XTZ – I spent hours and hours
of flying time trying to isolate it, trying different power settings,
different aircraft loading, different angles of attack, you name it – I could
not find a pattern. Mostly its there, but occasionally nothing. Visually, it
manifests itself with a very slight port wing tip / aileron quiver;
physically, you can mainly feel it ever so slightly in the rudder pedals.
Having said all this, others fly in the aircraft and don't know what I'm on
about.  But, I have now found that running at about 2540rpm is quite
smooth and all but gets rid of the vibration. Its noticeably worse at say 2400
– 2450rpm.

So – endeavouring to quantify things, I employed the iPhone App you have
mentioned.  The attached pics are from way back in 2011; these should
give everyone an idea of what can be produced. Below my comments at the time
wrt to attached samples.

As one of our other forum contributors mentioned, vibration is very
subjective without the use of measurement devices… so can I suggest that those
whip have access to iPhones go flying and capture outputs in the same manner
and with same engine settings – how about with iPhone resting on centre
console and engine set at 2500rpm, 19" and leaned 28degC (50degF) rich of
peak…. Or as anyone else might suggest otherwise.  Then we can all
collect data that should be legitimately comparable, and perhaps identify if
there are any substantial differences in the vibration characteristics.
Anyways, just an idea….

Comments from tests in August 2011:-

Captured
three outputs with 2400rpm and about 19” MAP.  First sample with iPhone
on the centre console shows a spike at ~20Hz – that is approx. equivalent to
1200rpm, which exactly half the engine engine rpm. For other two samples,
iPhone on the dust cover in the middle and then a bit to one side; these show
the same 20Hz spike, and also a spike around 38 - 40Hz – this would seem to be
close to the engine rpm, but 38Hz is equivalent to 2280rpm, which does not
make sense as there is no way the engine rpm varies by that much. So, I’m not
sure what all this means. I’d love to get the iPhone onto the rudder pedals,
but that’s kind of tricky! The iPhone doesn’t measure above 50Hz, so I can
detect prop beat or exhaust beat.


Regards,


John


John N G Smith
Tel / fax:
   +61-8-9385-8891
Mobile:
     +61-409-372-975
Email:
        john [at] jjts.net.au


From: Kyrilian Dyer <kyrilian_av [at] yahoo.com

>
Reply-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Date: Friday, 26 July 2013 6:22 PM
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine
Vibration

If you'd like to measure the frequency and amplitude of relatively low
frequency vibration I'd recommend an iPhone app called 'Vibration' ($4.99
from the App Store).  It's certainly not high end but it may help in
characterizing some of the vibrations that you guys describe. The only
problem I see is that it only samples up to 100 Hz, which gives you
frequency data up to 44.9 Hz (~2690 rpm).  This won't give you any data
at propeller frequencies.  But it may help tell if its a function of
RPM at 1/rev, or if it's asynchronous with the engine (and doesn't correlate
with engine speed, such as buffet or flutter).

A few screenshots (recording of an out of balance car tire at 70 mph)
are shown below. Note that the app can output data to a .csv file, which can
be reviewed/analyzed later.  I do this sort of thing with proper
accelerometers, recorders and analyzers on helicopters in my day job, so I'd
like to help if I can.  If anyone has luck with the iPhone app please
send me the data files.  Perhaps we could then compare between
aircraft.

 Regards,
- Kyrilian
  L2K-236

Time display:
image.png

DFT (note spike at around 16 Hz)
image.png

Setup (one of several sub screens)
image.png


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:46 PM, "Dennis Johnson" <pinetownd [at] volcano.net

>
wrote:

I have a smooth running Legacy RG IO-550 with a three blade Hartzell
scimitar prop, HC-J3YF-1RF/F7391D-3/SM7. 
 
According to Hartzell's website, this is the recommended three blade
scimitar prop for the Legacy RG with IO-550 engine.  It is a 72"
diameter prop, not the 78" prop mentioned in Bob R's posting.  I
thought all the scimitar props on Legacys were the same as mine.
 
 
I consider mine to be "smooth," but that is a terribly subjective
concept.  However, I can say for sure that I do not feel vibration in
the stick and don't see any aileron vibration or wing tip
vibration.  Another Legacy builder and pilot commented on how
smooth mine is, but maybe he was just being polite.   
 
Unless there is a way to quantify "vibration" and "smoothness," I
don't see how we can accurately communicate about this.  One person's
rough could be another person's smooth.  Maybe if someone had a
video of stick shake or aileron shake?  A glass of water sitting on
the glare shield? 
 
Dennis
Legacy 625 hours 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: John Smith <john [at] jjts.net.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:20:57 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
I did start to research the idea of locating accelerometers around the airframe – seem to recall that I'd be spending several thousands on a "kit" with all the boxes of tricks required to do this. I figured that there must be a solution around where there is an accelerometer that could be plugged into a simple signal amplifier and then to a laptop….. but gave up the search when someone told me about the iPhone accelerometer. If I could work out how to operate my iPhone remotely, I would be placing it in the wing tip and all sorts of other places around the airframe. Don't suppose there's an app around that allows remote control of one iPhone by another over their Bluetooth links?!

However – I think the iPhone is a very clever bit of kit, but without some testing, I wonder just how accurate its accelerometer is.. but at least it gives us a clue.

So - does anyone have any ideas as to what / where to source a cost effective solution?  Or may someone has the equipment already? 

BTW – I don't have an stick vibration, and elevators / rudder are scalloped per the Lancair supplied sections.

Regards,



John



John N G Smith

Tel / fax:    +61-8-9385-8891

Mobile:      +61-409-372-975

Email:         john [at] jjts.net.au



From: Wolfgang <Wolfgang [at] MiCom.net

>
Reply-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Date: Saturday, 27 July 2013 4:30 AM
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

It sounds like accelerometers mounted in suspect
locations with the engine running at the RPM indicated by the spike shown by the
Apple app. would lead you to the culprit.
 
Wolfgang
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
john [at] jjts.net.au (John Smith)

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net

Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:47
PM
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential
Problem-Engine Vibration

Kryilian,

I too have this vibration phenomenon in VH-XTZ ? I spent hours and hours
of flying time trying to isolate it, trying different power settings,
different aircraft loading, different angles of attack, you name it ? I could
not find a pattern. Mostly its there, but occasionally nothing. Visually, it
manifests itself with a very slight port wing tip / aileron quiver;
physically, you can mainly feel it ever so slightly in the rudder pedals.
Having said all this, others fly in the aircraft and don't know what I'm on
about.  But, I have now found that running at about 2540rpm is quite
smooth and all but gets rid of the vibration. Its noticeably worse at say 2400
? 2450rpm.

So ? endeavouring to quantify things, I employed the iPhone App you have
mentioned.  The attached pics are from way back in 2011; these should
give everyone an idea of what can be produced. Below my comments at the time
wrt to attached samples.

As one of our other forum contributors mentioned, vibration is very
subjective without the use of measurement devices? so can I suggest that those
whip have access to iPhones go flying and capture outputs in the same manner
and with same engine settings ? how about with iPhone resting on centre
console and engine set at 2500rpm, 19" and leaned 28degC (50degF) rich of
peak?. Or as anyone else might suggest otherwise.  Then we can all
collect data that should be legitimately comparable, and perhaps identify if
there are any substantial differences in the vibration characteristics.
Anyways, just an idea?.

Comments from tests in August 2011:-

Captured
three outputs with 2400rpm and about 19? MAP.  First sample with iPhone
on the centre console shows a spike at ~20Hz ? that is approx. equivalent to
1200rpm, which exactly half the engine engine rpm. For other two samples,
iPhone on the dust cover in the middle and then a bit to one side; these show
the same 20Hz spike, and also a spike around 38 - 40Hz ? this would seem to be
close to the engine rpm, but 38Hz is equivalent to 2280rpm, which does not
make sense as there is no way the engine rpm varies by that much. So, I?m not
sure what all this means. I?d love to get the iPhone onto the rudder pedals,
but that?s kind of tricky! The iPhone doesn?t measure above 50Hz, so I can
detect prop beat or exhaust beat.


Regards,


John


John N G Smith
Tel / fax:
   +61-8-9385-8891
Mobile:
     +61-409-372-975
Email:
        john [at] jjts.net.au




From: Kyrilian Dyer <kyrilian_av [at] yahoo.com

>
Reply-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Date: Friday, 26 July 2013 6:22 PM
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine
Vibration

If you'd like to measure the frequency and amplitude of relatively low
frequency vibration I'd recommend an iPhone app called 'Vibration' ($4.99
from the App Store).  It's certainly not high end but it may help in
characterizing some of the vibrations that you guys describe. The only
problem I see is that it only samples up to 100 Hz, which gives you
frequency data up to 44.9 Hz (~2690 rpm).  This won't give you any data
at propeller frequencies.  But it may help tell if its a function of
RPM at 1/rev, or if it's asynchronous with the engine (and doesn't correlate
with engine speed, such as buffet or flutter).

A few screenshots (recording of an out of balance car tire at 70 mph)
are shown below. Note that the app can output data to a .csv file, which can
be reviewed/analyzed later.  I do this sort of thing with proper
accelerometers, recorders and analyzers on helicopters in my day job, so I'd
like to help if I can.  If anyone has luck with the iPhone app please
send me the data files.  Perhaps we could then compare between
aircraft.

 Regards,
- Kyrilian
  L2K-236

Time display:
image.png

DFT (note spike at around 16 Hz)
image.png

Setup (one of several sub screens)
image.png


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:46 PM, "Dennis Johnson" <pinetownd [at] volcano.net

>
wrote:

I have a smooth running Legacy RG IO-550 with a three blade Hartzell
scimitar prop, HC-J3YF-1RF/F7391D-3/SM7. 
 
According to Hartzell's website, this is the recommended three blade
scimitar prop for the Legacy RG with IO-550 engine.  It is a 72"
diameter prop, not the 78" prop mentioned in Bob R's posting.  I
thought all the scimitar props on Legacys were the same as mine.
 
 
I consider mine to be "smooth," but that is a terribly subjective
concept.  However, I can say for sure that I do not feel vibration in
the stick and don't see any aileron vibration or wing tip
vibration.  Another Legacy builder and pilot commented on how
smooth mine is, but maybe he was just being polite.   
 
Unless there is a way to quantify "vibration" and "smoothness," I
don't see how we can accurately communicate about this.  One person's
rough could be another person's smooth.  Maybe if someone had a
video of stick shake or aileron shake?  A glass of water sitting on
the glare shield? 
 
Dennis
Legacy 625 hours 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 13:34:56 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net" <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Sent:
Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed
several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then,
unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many
pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: <vtailjeff [at] aol.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:36:27 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same pitch change mechanism.

J

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Sent:
Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed
several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then,
unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many
pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:21:22 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
It could be possible for wear or manufacturing process to allow one blade to have more play in pitch operation than the others. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze 

On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, vtailjeff [at] aol.com

wrote:

How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same pitch change mechanism.

J

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Sent:
Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed
several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then,
unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many
pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul



Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Danny <danny [at] n107sd.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:37:30 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

WHAT?  That makes no sense at all.  Where did you ever get such an idea?

 

Danny

LNC2-360 Mk-II

Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool.

 

From: Craig Schulze [craig [at] skybolt.net]">mailto:craig [at] skybolt.net]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 2:21 PM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

 

It could be possible for wear or manufacturing process to allow one blade to have more play in pitch operation than the others. 

Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze 


On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, vtailjeff [at] aol.com

wrote:

How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same pitch change mechanism.

 

J

Sent from my iPad


On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 

 

 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration


It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: <Sky2high [at] aol.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:39:10 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Craig, et al,
 
Interesting ......
 
A friend with a 600 hr, 6 cyl Continental engine switched from
a 2 blade to a 3 blade prop with resulting obnoxious vibration and,
after weeks of meticulously ridding the engine compartment of anything that
moved from touching the fuselage or cowling, consulted a gray haired
A&P who related how the wear pattern against bearings by
torque pulses from using a 2-blade and a 3-blade prop would be in
different places in the engine.  He went back to a 2-blade prop and
all vibration disappeared.
 
There was an example of a change affected by how the engine
bearing had worn that definitely resulted in inducing vibration.
 
Grayhawk
 
In a message dated 7/28/2013 1:21:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
craig [at] skybolt.net writes:

It could be possible for wear or manufacturing process to allow one blade
to have more play in pitch operation than the others. 

Blue
Skies,
Craig Schulze 

On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, vtailjeff [at] aol.com

wrote:

How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same
pitch change mechanism.

J

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
wrote:

That
is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it. 
Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to
position correctly.

Steve Colwell 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>

Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>

Sent: Friday, July 26,
2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re:
Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

It sounds to me that you may have an issue
with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all
the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a
larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles
in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop
is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig
Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve
Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused
stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for
almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference
locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear
door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to
replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock
ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly
Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill
Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy
file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator
counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go
back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in
flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I
replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the
prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual
vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights. 
Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power
reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I
could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous
conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at
Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3
Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing
List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On
Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To:
lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject:
[LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is
smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but
virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes
and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can
be a
wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as
the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range
and visible at the
wingtip
also.

Paul



=


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:29:49 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Agreed, I wouldn't have the nerve to pitch that to hartzell and mr brown.  They are not fly by nights at hartzell.   The issue is whether a common problem exists.  I think Hartzell system wide manufacturing defect can be safely moved to low priority. Hartzell does a thorough vibration analysis on engine prop combinations so I don't see how something new cropped up there.

Lyc had the crankshaft issue on the Malibu, I don't recall it being related to prop at all.

I think it is a mistake to look for hartzell 550 combination as being a factor in vibration since the sample is largely hartzell and 550.  You need some other way to differentiate between vibrating and non vibrating installations.  I can safely say that if I found 20 contact points in the legacy over the last four years I would be cataloging those points first and confirming they are not in play.   Once those are ruled out then you have something to work with.   A database of 550s with and without problems may not go very far to getting a resolution.

Paul

On 2013-07-28, at 14:37, "Danny" <danny [at] n107sd.com

> wrote:

WHAT?  That makes no sense at all.  Where did you ever get such an idea?

 

Danny

LNC2-360 Mk-II

Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool.

 

From: Craig Schulze [craig [at] skybolt.net (mailto:)

]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 2:21 PM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

 

It could be possible for wear or manufacturing process to allow one blade to have more play in pitch operation than the others. 

Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze 


On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, vtailjeff [at] aol.com

wrote:

How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same pitch change mechanisms Elton 

 

J

Sent from my iPad


On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 

 

 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration


It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:54:22 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Gents

Lets clarify a bit.  We are NOT talking about a typical persistent vibration.  It is not a case of interference with the cowl or anything else like that.  There are 4 reasons I state this:

1.  Previous 3 blade prop did not have this phenomenon in my own installation (Aerocomposites 3 blade), and doesn't seem to be present on any 4 blade installations or any non-Hartzell props.  Vibration problems sorted over 1250 hours TT before changing to Hartzell prop (by Jeff Edwards - this was his plane before I bought it!).
2.  Vibration amplitude changes over time with no power changes (such as in cruise) - not typical for interference issues...
3.  Vibration AMPLITUDE changes with a change in RPM.  This  data point got prop shop and mechanic very worried, which led me to a new prop and the test of the crank - thank God.
4.  Vibration phenomenon was persistent before and after a complete overhaul (by Barrett in Tulsa).   And magnaflux/ultrasound of crank at overhaul showed no problem.  This rules out any crank weight problems or misfiring, etc.  

So its incorrect to lump this phenomenon in with all of the other normal vibration issues we deal with as a community.  With very few (known) exceptions, this seems to be localized to big bore continental engines paired with 76" (or 78") Hartzell 3 blade newer scimitar props.  There are certainly those out there with this combination that do not have this problem, but there are many of us that do have it and cannot fix it by any known means - short of changing the prop.  So I wouldn't rule out a compatibility problem, a prop design problem, a crank flange problem, or something we have not thought of yet.  

The most important thing is for those of us who have this problem to check for cracks in the prop flange asap.  If found, fix and document so we don't lose another prop in flight (or worse).  In the meantime we will collect data and see where it leads us.

Bob R

On Jul 28, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com

> wrote:

Agreed, I wouldn't have the nerve to pitch that to hartzell and mr brown.  They are not fly by nights at hartzell.   The issue is whether a common problem exists.  I think Hartzell system wide manufacturing defect can be safely moved to low priority. Hartzell does a thorough vibration analysis on engine prop combinations so I don't see how something new cropped up there.

Lyc had the crankshaft issue on the Malibu, I don't recall it being related to prop at all.

I think it is a mistake to look for hartzell 550 combination as being a factor in vibration since the sample is largely hartzell and 550.  You need some other way to differentiate between vibrating and non vibrating installations.  I can safely say that if I found 20 contact points in the legacy over the last four years I would be cataloging those points first and confirming they are not in play.   Once those are ruled out then you have something to work with.   A database of 550s with and without problems may not go very far to getting a resolution.

Paul

On 2013-07-28, at 14:37, "Danny" <danny [at] n107sd.com

> wrote:

WHAT?  That makes no sense at all.  Where did you ever get such an idea?

 

Danny

LNC2-360 Mk-II

Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool.

 

From: Craig Schulze [craig [at] skybolt.net (mailto:)

]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 2:21 PM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

 

It could be possible for wear or manufacturing process to allow one blade to have more play in pitch operation than the others. 

Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze 


On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, vtailjeff [at] aol.com

wrote:

How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same pitch change mechanisms Elton 

 

J

Sent from my iPad


On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 

 

 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration


It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:57:11 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Has an SDR been filed?  Is there a diagram or photo to review of where this inspection should take place? A YouTube or photo of the area of concern would be useful.  Last, any common issues with other aircraft flying the combo that we know about? 

Paul
Legacy


The most important thing is for those of us who have this problem to check for cracks in the prop flange asap.  If found, fix and document so we don't lose another prop in flight (or worse).  In the meantime we will collect data and see where it leads us.


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:23:26 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

One thing to keep in mind is that the prop balancing on the ground is not as accurate as when the scimitar is loaded in flight. This comes directly from one of the SX300 guys testing one of the Scimitars for Hartzell on his Lyc 580.   What he did was run the cables through the heat duct and perform the balance in flight conditions.  He reported that balancing the scimitars was not easy.  I had a hard time finding a good balance on the ground on the Legacy but it was passable.  I may try the in-flight balance next time at the 2300 rpm mark.  Our Legacy scimitars are simply cut shorter than the longer bladed scimitars for ground clearance.


Second, the engine and cowl moves a lot and the clearances are very tight in the Legacy.  At 2700 RPM and low airspeed the cowl is different shape than at cruise and the engine is in a different position relative to the mounts that at 2300.  The torque on the engine mounts is much different at 2300 versus 2700.  I found a lot of interference showed up as the RPM came down from 2700 to 2300 and then the engine and cowling were slightly separated so that the banging was transmitted.  I believe at other settings the engine was up against parts of the cowl and the actual vibration was transmitted.  I had the nose gear interference as well plus the baffling hit the prop governor cable in cruise.  Lots of areas where interference fits are really tight.  My point is that there are many factors that can affect vibration with changing throttle and RPM and it isn't just the prop/crankshaft combo that can be at issue.  I was seeing almost two inches of cowl movement between rest and flight at certain locations.   Thats a lot.

Not to take anything away from the issue under discussion except to say that, in my Legacy, vibration amplitude did change with varying RPM as a result of mechanical interference.

Paul
Legacy

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:46:05 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Here is a pic of the crack (red box) and red tag showing the crack data.  Nothing much to look at, even in the high resolution version.  I couldn't see anything with the naked eye.    I did file an SDR about a week and a half ago, no response yet.  As far as common issues, I have had people respond that they have exactly the same symptoms as I have had.  They are all people with a big bore continental and 3 blade Hartzell prop.  I don't know of anyone else that has found a crack or if anyone has tested their crank flange.








On Jul 28, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Kyrilian Dyer <kyrilian_av [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:



Bob,

Do you have photos of the crack?  What frequency was the vibration?  The same as an imbalance (~40 Hz), or faster?  I realize that judging frequency is tough.  How repeatably could you induce this?

I've been discussing with Colyn Case, and would like to lend a hand in chasing this down if possible.  I don't have much experience with piston engine vibration or propeller dynamics per se, but I work as a structures and dynamics flight test engineer on helicopters (lots of spinning shafts, aerodynamic surfaces, bearings, absorbers, dampers, etc.). Just trying to better understand what you experienced.  I'd like to measure the vibration and perform spectral analysis if there's a plane with the same symptoms.  Especially if it's nearby (I live in south FL).

- Kyrilian

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 28, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com

> wrote:

Gents

Lets clarify a bit.  We are NOT talking about a typical persistent vibration.  It is not a case of interference with the cowl or anything else like that.  There are 4 reasons I state this:

1.  Previous 3 blade prop did not have this phenomenon in my own installation (Aerocomposites 3 blade), and doesn't seem to be present on any 4 blade installations or any non-Hartzell props.  Vibration problems sorted over 1250 hours TT before changing to Hartzell prop (by Jeff Edwards - this was his plane before I bought it!).
2.  Vibration amplitude changes over time with no power changes (such as in cruise) - not typical for interference issues...
3.  Vibration AMPLITUDE changes with a change in RPM.  This  data point got prop shop and mechanic very worried, which led me to a new prop and the test of the crank - thank God.
4.  Vibration phenomenon was persistent before and after a complete overhaul (by Barrett in Tulsa).   And magnaflux/ultrasound of crank at overhaul showed no problem.  This rules out any crank weight problems or misfiring, etc.  

So its incorrect to lump this phenomenon in with all of the other normal vibration issues we deal with as a community.  With very few (known) exceptions, this seems to be localized to big bore continental engines paired with 76" (or 78") Hartzell 3 blade newer scimitar props.  There are certainly those out there with this combination that do not have this problem, but there are many of us that do have it and cannot fix it by any known means - short of changing the prop.  So I wouldn't rule out a compatibility problem, a prop design problem, a crank flange problem, or something we have not thought of yet.  

The most important thing is for those of us who have this problem to check for cracks in the prop flange asap.  If found, fix and document so we don't lose another prop in flight (or worse).  In the meantime we will collect data and see where it leads us.

Bob R

On Jul 28, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com

> wrote:

Agreed, I wouldn't have the nerve to pitch that to hartzell and mr brown.  They are not fly by nights at hartzell.   The issue is whether a common problem exists.  I think Hartzell system wide manufacturing defect can be safely moved to low priority. Hartzell does a thorough vibration analysis on engine prop combinations so I don't see how something new cropped up there.

Lyc had the crankshaft issue on the Malibu, I don't recall it being related to prop at all.

I think it is a mistake to look for hartzell 550 combination as being a factor in vibration since the sample is largely hartzell and 550.  You need some other way to differentiate between vibrating and non vibrating installations.  I can safely say that if I found 20 contact points in the legacy over the last four years I would be cataloging those points first and confirming they are not in play.   Once those are ruled out then you have something to work with.   A database of 550s with and without problems may not go very far to getting a resolution.

Paul

On 2013-07-28, at 14:37, "Danny" <danny [at] n107sd.com

> wrote:

WHAT?  That makes no sense at all.  Where did you ever get such an idea?

 

Danny

LNC2-360 Mk-II

Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool.

 

From: Craig Schulze [craig [at] skybolt.net (mailto:)

]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 2:21 PM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

 

It could be possible for wear or manufacturing process to allow one blade to have more play in pitch operation than the others. 

Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze 


On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, vtailjeff [at] aol.com

wrote:

How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same pitch change mechanisms Elton 

 

J

Sent from my iPad


On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 

 

 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration


It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul





Bob Rickard
President, Rickard Consulting Group, Inc.
r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com






Image


IMG_0339.jpg


Image


IMG_0340.jpg


Image


RCG Logo for Email.jpg

Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Paul Miller <pjdmiller [at] gmail.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:20:04 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Bob: thanks for that picture, it is helpful.  We have a boatload of scimitar/550s here at Spruce.  We also have the Lancair scimitar mated to Lyc540 and 580s on the SX300s and one is using a newer Hartzell scimitar on a Lyc580.  Perhaps it makes sense for our group to gather and perform a dye penetrant test on one or more to get some data particularly if this is hidden from casual view.


Paul
Spruce Creek


On 2013-07-29, at 2:46 PM, Bob Rickard <r.rickard [at] rcginc-us.com

> wrote:



Here is a pic of the crack (red box) and red tag showing the crack data.  Nothing much to look at, even in the high resolution version.  I couldn't see anything with the naked eye.    I did file an SDR about a week and a half ago, no response yet.  As far as common issues, I have had people respond that they have exactly the same symptoms as I have had.  They are all people with a big bore continental and 3 blade Hartzell prop.  I don't know of anyone else that has found a crack or if anyone has tested their crank flange.


Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

From: Colyn Case <colyncase [at] earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:10:49 -0400
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Blue


On Jul 28, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Paul Miller wrote:



Agreed, I wouldn't have the nerve to pitch that to hartzell and mr brown.  They are not fly by nights at hartzell.   The issue is whether a common problem exists.  I think Hartzell system wide manufacturing defect can be safely moved to low priority. Hartzell does a thorough vibration analysis on engine prop combinations so I don't see how something new cropped up there.

Lyc had the crankshaft issue on the Malibu, I don't recall it being related to prop at all.

I think it is a mistake to look for hartzell 550 combination as being a factor in vibration since the sample is largely hartzell and 550.  You need some other way to differentiate between vibrating and non vibrating installations.  I can safely say that if I found 20 contact points in the legacy over the last four years I would be cataloging those points first and confirming they are not in play.   Once those are ruled out then you have something to work with.   A database of 550s with and without problems may not go very far to getting a resolution.  Of course not.  But it will establish a couple basic facts and identify a group of people interested in drilling deeper.   In the meantime, do you want to publish your list of 20 contact points?


Paul

On 2013-07-28, at 14:37, "Danny" <danny [at] n107sd.com

> wrote:

WHAT?  That makes no sense at all.  Where did you ever get such an idea?

 

Danny

LNC2-360 Mk-II

Nothing is foolproof to the sufficiently talented fool.

 

From: Craig Schulze [craig [at] skybolt.net (mailto:)

]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 2:21 PM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

 

It could be possible for wear or manufacturing process to allow one blade to have more play in pitch operation than the others. 

Blue Skies,

Craig Schulze 


On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, vtailjeff [at] aol.com

wrote:

How is that mechanically possible? All blades are attached to the same pitch change mechanisms Elton 

 

J

Sent from my iPad


On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

That is a possibility I had not considered, I will ask Hartzell about it.  Another possibility is the movable crankshaft counter weights failing to position correctly.

Steve Colwell 

 

 



From: Craig Schulze <craig [at] skybolt.net

>
To: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

>
Cc: "lml [at] lancaironline.net

" <lml [at] lancaironline.net

>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration


It sounds to me that you may have an issue with your prop hub not changing the pitch exactly the  same on all the blades.  The vibration you are feeling is one blade taking a larger bite of air and then causing everything to wobble.  It settles in sometimes but when you change the power setting the pitch on the prop is adjusted by the hub unevenly. 

Blue Skies,
Craig Schulze
Lancair N73S


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919 [at] yahoo.com

> wrote:

In the first 40 hours I had vibration so severe it caused stick shake.  This
has continued intermittently more or less for almost 400 hours.

First I found and fixed several Cowl Interference locations, then adjusted
and notched the hat section of the nose gear door.

At about 50 hours I paid Barrett to tear down the engine to replace the
Performance pistons (prematurely worn top rings) with stock ECI pistons.
Also found a cracked case.

We had the Kelly Alternator balanced and rebuilt at a shop recommended by
Bill Bainbridge of B & C.  Sorry I can't remember the name, the Legacy file
is in Texas.

I rounded the leading edges of the elevator counter weights when building so
I temporarily squared them off to go back to the stock shape for testing.

All gear doors were checked in flight with video camera.

The pitch trim hinge pin had play, I replaced it per Chris Zavatson's web
page.

Along the way the prop was balanced twice.

I could not get more that the usual vibration (which always seemed to be too
much) on test flights.  Then, unpredictably, vibration magnitude would
increase with power reduction on some later flight.  I say unpredictably
because I could not get increased vibration by attempting to duplicate
previous conditions.  Let's hope a solution surfaces at Airventure.

Steve Colwell  Legacy RG IO550-N with Hartzell 3 Blade



-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net

] On Behalf Of Paul
Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net


Subject: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration

Ed Martin's legacy is smooth.  Mine has had a lot of annoying vibes as you
describe but virtually all have been removed with lots of cowling
interference fixes and plug change.  Many pilots forget the alternator can
be a wicked source of vibration and it is almost in the same plane as the
prop.

The problems I had originally were in that freq range and visible at the
wingtip also.

Paul



Pages

Post a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readable fashion or, if JavaScript is enabled, replaced with a spam resistent clickable link. Email addresses will get the default web form unless specified. If replacement text (a persons name) is required a webform is also required. Separate each part with the "|" pipe symbol. Replace spaces in names with "_".
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h1> <h2> <h3>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readable fashion or, if JavaScript is enabled, replaced with a spam resistent clickable link. Email addresses will get the default web form unless specified. If replacement text (a persons name) is required a webform is also required. Separate each part with the "|" pipe symbol. Replace spaces in names with "_".
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Attachments
Files must be less than 512 MB.
Allowed file types: jpg jpeg gif png txt doc docx xls xlsx pdf ppt pptx pps ppsx odt ods odp mp3 mov mp4 m4a m4v mpeg avi ogg oga ogv weba webp webm.